<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Noël, Josh Groban</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2008/12/noel-josh-groban/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2008/12/noel-josh-groban/</link>
	<description>“Listen all the time, and remind yourself when you’re not listening, or else the mike and the tape recorder will get the best of you.” – Pauline Oliveros</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 01:08:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roberta</title>
		<link>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2008/12/noel-josh-groban/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Roberta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 00:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajtesttest.wordpress.com/2008/12/12/noel-josh-groban/#comment-363</guid>
		<description>OK. I feel the need to comment here even though I just usually just lurk.&lt;br/&gt;I agree with both Darth and Ryan&#039;s comments. Believe it or not, I own the CD. It was the third Christmas album I listened to this year, after  Chanticleer and The Cambridge singers. I have to tell you that the reason I bought it is &quot;The Voice.&quot; I think sentimental can be overdone but this album has just the right amount that we expect from a Christmas recording. There are many others that are so sentimental they make me cry - and I don&#039;t mean that in a good way! I have to admit, I always skip the track Josh sings with Faith Hill. That is simply painful for me to listen to. His voice, singing familiar songs makes this a must for my Christmas listening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK. I feel the need to comment here even though I just usually just lurk.<br />I agree with both Darth and Ryan&#8217;s comments. Believe it or not, I own the CD. It was the third Christmas album I listened to this year, after  Chanticleer and The Cambridge singers. I have to tell you that the reason I bought it is &#8220;The Voice.&#8221; I think sentimental can be overdone but this album has just the right amount that we expect from a Christmas recording. There are many others that are so sentimental they make me cry &#8211; and I don&#8217;t mean that in a good way! I have to admit, I always skip the track Josh sings with Faith Hill. That is simply painful for me to listen to. His voice, singing familiar songs makes this a must for my Christmas listening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darth_Harbison</title>
		<link>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2008/12/noel-josh-groban/comment-page-1/#comment-362</link>
		<dc:creator>Darth_Harbison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajtesttest.wordpress.com/2008/12/12/noel-josh-groban/#comment-362</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t have enough musical knowledge to take issue with most of what you said, but I feel the need to jump to Groban&#039;s defense because (while I don&#039;t personally own any of his CDs) I greatly enjoy his music. I shall therefore refrain from taking issue with any of the musical issues and focus on the Christmas CD . . .&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You criticize it as being &quot;unoriginal&quot; in &quot;the most overdone genre of music in contemporary history.&quot; This may be true, but I think that part of the charm of Christmas music is that it&#039;s always pretty much the same. I love it as much as the next person when someone does something really new and creative without really changing anything (ala Mannheim Steamroller or Trans-Siberian Orchestra), but I think a lot of traditional Christmas music could be ruined in the name of &quot;originality.&quot; Of course, this might just be me, since as you know I&#039;m big on tradition.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You also criticized it for sappy sentimentalism . . . And while generally I agree that it&#039;s not a good thing (although I like &quot;You Raise Me Up&quot; a fair amount), I think that, again, it can be forgiven in Christmas music—in fact, I think it&#039;s part of the point. There are, of course, some Christmas songs with enough actual depth that sappy sentimentalism seems almost irreverent (e.g. Joy to the World, perhaps the most brutalized-by-overuse song of all time), but I don&#039;t think that indulging ourselves in enjoying sappy sentimentalism at Christmas is necessarily be a bad thing. The way I see it, as long as we keep in mind (for lack of a less cheesy phrase) the true meaning of Christmas, there&#039;s really no harm in enjoying it as a secular holiday, as well.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And I&#039;m happy that you think Little Drummer Boy is so good, because this CD basically made it one of my favorite Christmas songs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t have enough musical knowledge to take issue with most of what you said, but I feel the need to jump to Groban&#8217;s defense because (while I don&#8217;t personally own any of his CDs) I greatly enjoy his music. I shall therefore refrain from taking issue with any of the musical issues and focus on the Christmas CD . . .</p>
<p>You criticize it as being &#8220;unoriginal&#8221; in &#8220;the most overdone genre of music in contemporary history.&#8221; This may be true, but I think that part of the charm of Christmas music is that it&#8217;s always pretty much the same. I love it as much as the next person when someone does something really new and creative without really changing anything (ala Mannheim Steamroller or Trans-Siberian Orchestra), but I think a lot of traditional Christmas music could be ruined in the name of &#8220;originality.&#8221; Of course, this might just be me, since as you know I&#8217;m big on tradition.</p>
<p>You also criticized it for sappy sentimentalism . . . And while generally I agree that it&#8217;s not a good thing (although I like &#8220;You Raise Me Up&#8221; a fair amount), I think that, again, it can be forgiven in Christmas music—in fact, I think it&#8217;s part of the point. There are, of course, some Christmas songs with enough actual depth that sappy sentimentalism seems almost irreverent (e.g. Joy to the World, perhaps the most brutalized-by-overuse song of all time), but I don&#8217;t think that indulging ourselves in enjoying sappy sentimentalism at Christmas is necessarily be a bad thing. The way I see it, as long as we keep in mind (for lack of a less cheesy phrase) the true meaning of Christmas, there&#8217;s really no harm in enjoying it as a secular holiday, as well.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m happy that you think Little Drummer Boy is so good, because this CD basically made it one of my favorite Christmas songs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryan fleming</title>
		<link>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2008/12/noel-josh-groban/comment-page-1/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>ryan fleming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajtesttest.wordpress.com/2008/12/12/noel-josh-groban/#comment-361</guid>
		<description>I can see how a musician with a college degree in composition can find the arangement of most of Josh&#039;s songs unoriginal or even cheesy; but while it may be unoriginal it still sounds good (in my opinion).  I especially love the &quot;inspirational&quot; whole step key changes that you mentioned, especially when there is a break in the music right before hand.  And I always find those sappy strings to be such a beautiful addition to any classical/pop music.  I think these type of musical additions may be overused, but this is so because of the great impact it can have on a song.  I do believe that they add a lot of power and feeling to a song.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see how a musician with a college degree in composition can find the arangement of most of Josh&#8217;s songs unoriginal or even cheesy; but while it may be unoriginal it still sounds good (in my opinion).  I especially love the &#8220;inspirational&#8221; whole step key changes that you mentioned, especially when there is a break in the music right before hand.  And I always find those sappy strings to be such a beautiful addition to any classical/pop music.  I think these type of musical additions may be overused, but this is so because of the great impact it can have on a song.  I do believe that they add a lot of power and feeling to a song.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2008/12/noel-josh-groban/comment-page-1/#comment-360</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 17:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajtesttest.wordpress.com/2008/12/12/noel-josh-groban/#comment-360</guid>
		<description>I always think it&#039;s interesting that Josh&#039;s voice still is trying to be forced into the classical category, when that&#039;s not what he considers himself.  While classicaly trained - which continues to this day - his love of music leads him in many directions.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;His fans have always joked about his being able to sing the phone book and make it sound amazing. I think he proves that everytime he sings at a charitable event with some other artist, to his Emmy performance - highlight of the show - to his &quot;Life Is A Masquerage&quot; on Ben Folds&#039; new album, and beyond.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;You might want to check out his duets with Placido Domingo and Charles Azvanour, the French artist, who have both just released new albums. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;And when they let him loose across the pond he just shines.  Here&#039;s a clip from Never Mind the Buzzcock&#039;s, a somewhat irreverant show making fun of pop music - he was a guest a couple of days ago.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3blK5laPQ8&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The Christmas album was done at the urging of his fans who&#039;ve wanted one for a few years now.  It was fast - but turned out to be brutal to other artists in the record industry proving that Josh&#039;s talent is not to be laughed at.&lt;br/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;There are too many facets to this young man to hold him down to one genre, thank goodness. And still, he&#039;s in his own lane.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always think it&#8217;s interesting that Josh&#8217;s voice still is trying to be forced into the classical category, when that&#8217;s not what he considers himself.  While classicaly trained &#8211; which continues to this day &#8211; his love of music leads him in many directions.  </p>
<p>His fans have always joked about his being able to sing the phone book and make it sound amazing. I think he proves that everytime he sings at a charitable event with some other artist, to his Emmy performance &#8211; highlight of the show &#8211; to his &#8220;Life Is A Masquerage&#8221; on Ben Folds&#8217; new album, and beyond.</p>
<p>You might want to check out his duets with Placido Domingo and Charles Azvanour, the French artist, who have both just released new albums. </p>
<p>And when they let him loose across the pond he just shines.  Here&#8217;s a clip from Never Mind the Buzzcock&#8217;s, a somewhat irreverant show making fun of pop music &#8211; he was a guest a couple of days ago.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3blK5laPQ8" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C3blK5laPQ8</a></p>
<p>The Christmas album was done at the urging of his fans who&#8217;ve wanted one for a few years now.  It was fast &#8211; but turned out to be brutal to other artists in the record industry proving that Josh&#8217;s talent is not to be laughed at.</p>
<p>There are too many facets to this young man to hold him down to one genre, thank goodness. And still, he&#8217;s in his own lane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2008/12/noel-josh-groban/comment-page-1/#comment-359</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ajtesttest.wordpress.com/2008/12/12/noel-josh-groban/#comment-359</guid>
		<description>The boy soprano on the &quot;Little Drummer Boy&quot; track is actually a girl!  More specifically, David Foster&#039;s daughter!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The boy soprano on the &#8220;Little Drummer Boy&#8221; track is actually a girl!  More specifically, David Foster&#8217;s daughter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

