<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Slate Magazine on &#8220;The centuries-old struggle to play in tune&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2010/04/slate-magazine-on-the-centuries-old-struggle-to-play-in-tune/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2010/04/slate-magazine-on-the-centuries-old-struggle-to-play-in-tune/</link>
	<description>“Listen all the time, and remind yourself when you’re not listening, or else the mike and the tape recorder will get the best of you.” – Pauline Oliveros</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 01:08:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hmm?</title>
		<link>http://www.thelisteningblog.com/2010/04/slate-magazine-on-the-centuries-old-struggle-to-play-in-tune/comment-page-1/#comment-80546</link>
		<dc:creator>Hmm?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 May 2010 01:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelisteningblog.com/?p=527#comment-80546</guid>
		<description>&quot;As Pythagoras also realized in mathematical terms, if you start with a C at the bottom of a piano keyboard and tune a series of 12 perfect 3:2 fifths up to the top, you discover that where you expect to have returned to a perfect high C, that C is overshot, intolerably out of tune.&quot;

It&#039;s not a C, though.  It&#039;s 12 perfect fifths above the note you started on.  To call it a &quot;C&quot; is to try to fit something natural onto something unnatural.  It only makes sense if you start out from the perspective of 12-tone equal temperament.

And what makes it &quot;impossible&quot;, to achieve a perfect tuning?  Make a harp and tune it to the harmonic series.  Done.  There&#039;s nothing impossible about it.  The thing that&#039;s impossible is trying to pick and choose frequencies so that they are roughly equally spaced from each other, yet also harmonious, when there&#039;s nothing about harmony that would lend itself to such a spacing.  Harmony is fractal, not regularly-spaced.

&quot;Equal temperament is the price we pay for all the marvelous modulations and exotic scales&quot;

Oh man.  Modulation is so cheesy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;As Pythagoras also realized in mathematical terms, if you start with a C at the bottom of a piano keyboard and tune a series of 12 perfect 3:2 fifths up to the top, you discover that where you expect to have returned to a perfect high C, that C is overshot, intolerably out of tune.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not a C, though.  It&#8217;s 12 perfect fifths above the note you started on.  To call it a &#8220;C&#8221; is to try to fit something natural onto something unnatural.  It only makes sense if you start out from the perspective of 12-tone equal temperament.</p>
<p>And what makes it &#8220;impossible&#8221;, to achieve a perfect tuning?  Make a harp and tune it to the harmonic series.  Done.  There&#8217;s nothing impossible about it.  The thing that&#8217;s impossible is trying to pick and choose frequencies so that they are roughly equally spaced from each other, yet also harmonious, when there&#8217;s nothing about harmony that would lend itself to such a spacing.  Harmony is fractal, not regularly-spaced.</p>
<p>&#8220;Equal temperament is the price we pay for all the marvelous modulations and exotic scales&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh man.  Modulation is so cheesy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

